It was last season when the Pittsburgh Steelers surpassed the Miami Dolphins as the most winningest team since the NFL merger in 1970. They are by far the best franchise in the NFL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...since_AFL-NFL_merger

Most wins
Most Super Bowl championships
Most Division titles
Most playoff wins (tied)
Most All-pros
Least Coaching changes

#2 in Super Bowl appearances (Dallas by only 1 appearance)
#2 in playoff berths (Dallas only by 1 game)
#2 in winning seasons (Miami by only 1 season)

WOW!!!!!

And for all you grandfathers who think football mattered before 1968, the Steelers are still ahead of the browns in all time wins.

632 Chicago, 1920-
590 Green Bay, 1921-
546 NY Giants, 1925-
506 Redskins, 1932-
470 Rams, 1937-
468 Pittsburgh, 1933-
459 Detroit, 1930-
439 49ers, 1950-
429 Cardinals, 1920-
427 Philadelphia, 1937-
390 Cleveland, 1950-

http://www.funtrivia.com/askft/Question22884.html

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...since_AFL-NFL_merger

Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source since anyone can edit add stats to it, try again with a reliable NFL source.

You're right Vambo...Anyone can add stats to it.
Not very reliable at all.

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...since_AFL-NFL_merger

Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source since anyone can edit add stats to it, try again with a reliable NFL source.

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...you'll sleep better not knowing....and like the old adage goes..."what you don't know wont hurt you".

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Why would I do any investagation? I'm not the one trying to prove a point with unreliable sources.

Besides when I bring up those types of stats you complain I'm living in the past.

Why would a Browns fan look up Steeler stats there own fanbase should be looking up.

We could careless about the Steelers.

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Why would I do any investagation? I'm not the one trying to prove a point with unreliable sources.

Like I said:
Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...you'll sleep better not knowing....and like the old adage goes..."what you don't know wont hurt you".

I consider my point proven. You don't believe it, look it up yourself.

quote:

Originally posted by BrownsFan1988:


We could careless about the Steelers.

Then why did you open the thread?

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Besides when I bring up those types of stats you complain I'm living in the past.

So why start listening to reason now?

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Why would I do any investagation? I'm not the one trying to prove a point with unreliable sources.

Like I said:
Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:

Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Why would I do any investagation? I'm not the one trying to prove a point with unreliable sources.

Like I said:
Of course you would rather just leave it at that than do your own investigating...

Stealing smack?!?!

I always knew you lacked the ability of original thought, but stealing someone elses line is low, I mean down to the scumbag level!

You can't hang with me, so you steal my stuff. TSK TSK vambo.

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:


Stealing smack?!?!

It was a simple way to state "POT MEET KETTLE"

I guess I gave you to much credit to figure that out.

You complain others repeat themselves but yet here you are repeating yourself.

But don't you know Vambo...it's ok for them to do that..but let anyone else try it and they complain. I'm starting to think that Woodey is a woman!

what do you mean what do you mean those people lol

Who are you talking to Billy...Who said "Those people?" I didn't that I'm aware of...LOL!

just twisting your words a little lol

As long as it's not a knife in my back that you're twisting Billy...it's ok..LOL!

i'll wait til the next browns steelers game for that chucky

Ouch!...I can feel it piercing the skin on my back already...LOL!

all i can say is did you watch yesterdays game that should have hurt you

It didn't Billy...it didn't surprise me in the least.

quote:

Originally posted by Vambo:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodley56:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N...since_AFL-NFL_merger

Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source since anyone can edit add stats to it, try again with a reliable NFL source.

WRONG!

Wikipedia IS a reliable source. People who edit and change the page have to provide a source, in which a morderator will evaluate to see if it's legitimate or not. Also, when people do edit the page, moderators hop on it almost immediatly.

The OP is right, just deal with it.

is that a self portrait chris lol

I truely doubt that Chris...I doubt if they are sitting around an office just waiting for something to come in...more conjecture then fact there too.

i have never found any misinformation on wikapedia and i use it quite a lot when i'm in a hurry but you do need to dosome fact checking to make sure

But I love how they come on here and just blurt things out and expect us to beleive them just because they said so.

and expect you to do the fact checking